Oh, and I don't disagree with that at all. I just just have an aesthetic preference for multiply qualified library names. Chalk it up to the fact that my partner's a librarian, so I'm used to putting things in categories, subcategories, and sub-sub-categories :-)
-- Jeff On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Henning Thielemann<lemm...@henning-thielemann.de> wrote: > > On Thu, 11 Jun 2009, Jeff Heard wrote: > >> case in point: Hieroglyph. What's it do? import Hieroglyph. Is >> there any clue by my function names which ones belong to a library >> called Hieroglyph? No. However, import >> Graphics.Rendering.Hieroglyph, and I see a function somewhere in the >> code called "arc" or "plane" or "circle", and I know it probably goes >> with the rendering package. > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Import_modules_properly > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
