Whoops, you're right. Interestingly, the shadowing warnings vary between the 2 examples I gave, i.e. shadowing within 'function definition' vs 'binding group'.
Felipe Lessa wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:49:12AM -0700, Kim-Ee Yeoh wrote: >> This isn't really a shadowing/redefinition issue. Here's >> a perfectly legitimate snippet that compiles fine: >> >> f 0 = 0 >> f otherwise = 1+otherwise > > What? It is a redefinition issue *as well*, but this kind of > warning isn't active by default > > Prelude> :s -Wall > Prelude> let f 0 = 0; f otherwise = 1 + otherwise > > <interactive>:1:15: > Warning: This binding for `otherwise' shadows the existing binding > imported from Prelude > In the definition of `f' > > -- > Felipe. > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/%22shadowing%22-keywords-like-%22otherwise%22-tp24239153p24244760.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
