On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 07:57:07PM +0530, Hemanth Kapila wrote:
> Can't we come up with something like this staying within the
> limits of purity?

No, because that would break referential transparency :(.  I.e.,
it would be possible to distinguish things that should be
"equal", such as '3' from '1+2'.

--
Felipe.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to