a...@spamcop.net wrote: > G'day all. > > Quoting John Meacham <j...@repetae.net>: > >> (+>) seems to imply to me that the operator is non-associative. Something >> like (<>) or (<+>) would be better. > > I tend to agree. Moreover, and I realise this may be a losing battle, > I want (++) to be the generic operator.
I totally agree. (+>) is too asymmetric for my taste, like (>>=) and (*>) it suggests asymmetry between the arguments. (++) is symmetric and suggests an associative operator to me. -- Jochem Berndsen | joc...@functor.nl GPG: 0xE6FABFAB _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
