2009/7/9 Marcin Kosiba <marcin.kos...@gmail.com>: > On Thursday 09 July 2009, Cristiano Paris wrote: >> Thanks. In fact, I was stuck trying to find an example which couldn't >> be written using Python's iterators. The only difference coming up to >> my mind was that Haskell's lists are a more natural way to express a >> program relying on laziness. That was the reason why added the clause >> "at least not elegantly" in my first post. > > Hi, > I recently tried writing some code to simulate a certain protocol in > Python. > I thought I'll go the "smart" way and rely on the Python yield construct to > do a CPS transformation of my code. > While this worked to a certain extent, composability was a problem, > because > any sub-procedure which used yield (and thus was an iterator) required being > called in a rather inelegant way.
I think I'll investigate Python's Iterator composability. Cristiano _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe