Hi, On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic < [email protected]> wrote:
> I am pleased to announce a new release of the graphviz package for > Haskell, which provides bindings to the GraphViz [1] suite of tools. > Nice work! As the way of defining an attribute for a specific grouping of > nodes/edges/subgraphs is to have them all listed after the attribute > definition (whereas those beforehand do not have this attribute), the > imperative nature of the Dot language does not allow us to split these > statements up as we currently do. > > [3] http://graphviz.org/doc/info/lang.html > > As such, I'm asking which of the following two choices people would > prefer: > 1. Follow upstream so that it can fully parse a Dot graph > 2. Keep it as it is, so that it is possible to consider all edges, > etc. easily. I would vote for the second one since I think that is the most widely used feature of this package. Cheers, Zsolt
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
