gale: > Other "batteries included" platforms contain > various tools for processing markup that are > far less general than pandoc. This is a place > where Haskell can shine. > > So yes, pandoc should definitely be included > in the platform. All that said, though, I will > certainly agree that it is not currently in the top 5. >
I agree with this. We would shine, but maybe not for the first cut. Especially since the maintainer has requested this. Note also: pandoc is GPL -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
