On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:34:28AM -0500, Derek Elkins wrote: > > As was just pointed out in the unsafeDestructiveAssign thread from which > > this thread was forked, effects are incompatible with non-strict > > evaluation. > > No, they aren't. At least, they aren't in any technical way. There > have been more than a few languages supporting both laziness and > mutation starting with Algol.
But laziness is just one way of implementing non-strictness, right? What about others methods? -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
