Richard O'Keefe schrieb: > > On Aug 22, 2009, at 11:49 AM, Mark Wassell wrote: >> Think about how you would convert this into Haskell. You might then >> find yourself wondering why you have to convert it into Haskell at all. > > But very quickly you realise that it is because a lot of > mathematical notation is heavily ambiguous and requires > fairly sophisticated N.I. to parse correctly.
Thus I had the idea to do it the other round: Typeset formulas as executable Haskell programs that can be converted and pretty printed by LaTeX. lhs2TeX allows a bit of this procedure. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
