On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 17:49 +0100, Andy Gimblett wrote: > So: am I right that this is the intended/expected behaviour? If not, > how does one get round it? If so, could someone perhaps comment on > the prospects/complexity of implementing this - or the reasons why it > is in fact a bad idea?
As Brad says, we implemented this in Cabal by doing a non-standard "unlit" operation. So cabal haddock will "do the right thing" for your examples. Running haddock directly and letting it do the unlitting will get different results. If the consensus is that the style of unliting that Cabal is doing is generally "the right thing" then perhaps we can standardise it and have ghc/haddock do it directly. Duncan _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
