That's a really shame. Any idea why? On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 3:02 PM, John A. De Goes <[email protected]> wrote:
> > CAL is interesting, but unfortunately dead, and has no community. > > Regards, > > John A. De Goes > N-Brain, Inc. > The Evolution of Collaboration > > http://www.n-brain.net | 877-376-2724 x 101 > > On Sep 27, 2009, at 3:38 PM, Peter Verswyvelen wrote: > > That's not really true. Just use CAL from the Open Quark framework... It's > almost Haskell 98, with some extras, and compiles to fast JVM code. > http://openquark.org/Open_Quark/Welcome.html > > <http://openquark.org/Open_Quark/Welcome.html>They even seem to do all > kinds of advanced optimizations - like converting tail calls to loops - to > get good Java performance. > > And they have a better record system, a graphical environment to learn it, > etc. > > So I think CAL should be in the list, and since it's basically Haskell... > > On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 6:36 PM, John A. De Goes <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I'm not sure what the point of your series is. No one who is using Java >> now commercially can move to Haskell because Haskell doesn't run on the JVM. >> >> It makes sense to discuss Clojure, Groovy, JRuby, Scala, Fan, etc., as >> "next Java's", because they all run on the JVM and have seamless interop >> with Java. Haskell is not in this category. It's stuck in a different world, >> wholly inaccessible to the masses. >> >> Regards, >> >> John A. De Goes >> N-Brain, Inc. >> The Evolution of Collaboration >> >> http://www.n-brain.net | 877-376-2724 x 101 >> >> >> On Sep 27, 2009, at 10:16 AM, Curt Sampson wrote: >> >> No, it's not quite what it sounds like. :-) >>> >>> Stuart Halloway recently posted a series of blog entries entitled >>> "Java.next"[1], discussing the benefits of four other languages that >>> compile to JVM bytecode and interoperate with Java: Clojure, Groovy, >>> JRuby, and Scala. I thought I'd put my oar in and write a parallel >>> series comparing Haskell to these. I've finished a draft of the first >>> posting, started on the third, and made a couple of notes on the second >>> and fourth, and I thought I'd post the drafts[2] and solicit comments >>> here. If you have time to read and comment, I'd greatly appreciate the >>> help; feel free either to e-mail me privately or post here. Also feel >>> free to forward this to anybody else you feel might be interested in >>> commenting. >>> >>> I'll probably be posting these about one per week, starting some time >>> next week. >>> >>> [1]: http://blog.thinkrelevance.com/2008/9/24/java-next-overview >>> [2]: >>> http://www.starling-software.com/en/blog/drafts/2009/09/27.succ-java-summary.html >>> >>> cjs >>> -- >>> Curt Sampson <[email protected]> +81 90 7737 2974 >>> Functional programming in all senses of the word: >>> http://www.starling-software.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
