On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Ariel J. Birnbaum <[email protected]> wrote: >> What about Lambdabot? > > The official (?) personification of Lambdabot is OK, but lacks moe[1], > which the OP seems to intend by using the suffix '-tan'. In any case, > she represents Lambdabot only, not Haskell in general. > A lambdabot-specific personification is fine too, but I agree that it lacks charm.
Though I wonder, where should we put these? Having the lambdabot one on the lambdabot page is fine, but haskell-tan would have to be stuck on the front page. Which seems a bit too much. -- Svein Ove Aas _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
