GTDNR is what I really want anyway... whether or not it's possible. :-) 

At any given time, importing everything unqualified from every module used by a 
typical hs leads only to a handful of ambiguities. While the general case might 
be "intractable", real-world cases might be trivial.

Regards,

John

On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:13 PM, wren ng thornton wrote:

> Twan van Laarhoven wrote:
>> My point is that desugaring "x.f" to "(f x)" and treating some instances of 
>> "(f x)" as "(ModuleToGuess.f x)" are two separate things. In the current 
>> proposal these two are combined, but I see no reason to do so.
>> To be a bit more concrete, I would propose:
>>  * General Type Directed Name Resolution (GTDNR):
>>      For every function application "f x" in the program where "f" is a      
>>  name, "f" is resolved based on the type of the argument "x".
>> Note that I am not saying that this is necessarily a good idea, it is just a 
>> possible alternative to the current TDNR proposal.
> 
> 
> I'm not a big fan of any of the TDNR proposals I've seen (I think we still 
> haven't found the right way to do it without it being just a hack), but I can 
> give one good reason for why these two parts of the proposal are grouped 
> together.
> 
> You suggest that GTDNR might not be a good idea, well why not? One reason is 
> that it can potentially lead to a whole lot of guessing, slowing the compiler 
> down dramatically and maybe even so much guessing that there are multiple 
> whole-program resolutions (oh noes!). So how can we control that 
> combinatorial exploration of alternatives? One way would be to restrict the 
> places where we allow guessing. There's still potential room for 
> combinatorial explosions but they're greatly reduced, both because we reduce 
> the number of variables in the problem (so the combinatorics are smaller), 
> and because we (generally) will have a good deal of non-variable context to 
> anchor the disambiguation process and hopefully resolve the variables easily.
> 
> -- 
> Live well,
> ~wren
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-Cafe mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to