> Incidentally, I've always wondered about the politically correct > way of referring to this programming language (and related > implementation in the above-mentioned type system) in academic > circles;
Is this a question of politically correctness? Since there's no discrimination or prejudice involved, I think it's more of a question of social rules. If you are using a word where it's going to be indexed, like article titles, I vote for beeing accurate. But outside that, it's difficult to answer this in a way that extends beyond one's own circle of friends. Censoring a bad word may be polite for some, and offensive for others, what could we do about that? Regarding brainfuck itself, I think beeing censored is part of the joke. > In general, if a programming language-related term contains what > is generally regarded as a profane word as a component, for > what kinds of written material should I prioritize accuracy vs. > propriety? If we decide to allow * inside conids and varids in Haskell, and have a rule that names clash when they differ only by a letter replaced by a *, we have gone too far. Best, Maurício _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
