Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
It used to be, because GHC used to implement so-called "deep skolemisation".  
See Section 4.6.2 of
http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/simonpj/papers/higher-rank/putting.pdf

Deep skolemisation was an unfortunate casualty of the push to add impredicative polymoprhism. However, as I mentioned in an earlier email, I'm currently planning to take impredicative polymorphism *out*, which means that deep skolemisation might come back *in*.

Are there workarounds for uses of impredicative types, or do we lose the ability to express certain programs as a result?

Thanks,

Martijn.

_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to