Ketil Malde wrote: > minh thu <not...@gmail.com> writes: >> Why should your code be licensed under GPL? > > I think your code is covered by whatever license you wish. > > An aggregate work, on the other hand, would need to be covered by the > GPL, and all source code would have to be available under GPL terms. So > if you distribute your code linked to or incorporating the GPL library, > the whole must conform to the GPL license (source availability and > redistributatbility, etc). > > Your contributions could still be licensed under a different license > (e.g. BSD), as long as the licensing doesn't prevent somebody else to > pick it up and relicense it under GPL. > > At least, that's how I understand things.
Right. So hakyll is absolutely fine with a BSD3 license, AFAICS. Cheers Ben _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
