Andrey Sisoyev wrote:
Hi everyone,

isEmptyTMVar :: TMVar a -> STM Bool  Source

Check whether a given TMVar is empty.

Notice that the boolean value returned is just a snapshot of the state of the TMVar. By the time you get to react on its result, the TMVar may have been filled (or emptied) - so be extremely careful when using this operation. Use tryTakeTMVar instead if possible.

When I read this in the haddock to Control.Concurrent.STM.TMVar, I started
to suspect that the behavior of TMVar and TChan might be worse than I
imagined.
That warning seems a little paranoid to me. The state of the TMVar must persist to the end of the transaction (from the point of view of the process executing a transaction), so isEmptyTMVar seems fine as long as you act on it in the same transaction. What would be bad would be something like:

do b <- atomically $ isEmptyTMVar tv
    if b ....

Where you act on the value in a later transaction. (Unless I've missed something?)
Few questions on TMVar and TChan:
(1) If 2 threads are sleeping-waiting for the output of TChan, and it gets
filled, do they both wakeup, or just one? (2) Similar question about reading/writing TMVar.
(3) If a thread is sleeping-waiting for the output of TChan, but transaction
wants to restart due to the change in any of touched TVar, then does the
thread wakeup and restart the transaction?
(4) Similar question about TMVar.

Also, if there is some paper on this, please, give me a link on it.
I believe, 1 and 2: both wake up and retry the transaction, but only the process that completes the transaction first will succeed, the other will end up going back to sleep. 3 and 4: yes. I think the rule is simply, if you call retry, you'll wait until any TVar you've read from so far changes, then you'll wake up and redo the transaction. To see how that affects TMVar and TChan, read their source code to see what they are actually doing with TVars and retry.

Neil.
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to