I've decided to settle on Data.CircularList. The renamed git repository is here:
http://github.com/sw17ch/data-clist On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Twan van Laarhoven <[email protected]>wrote: > John Van Enk wrote: > >> Hi Heinrich, >> >> >> I think I like Ring more than Necklace or Tom's suggestion of Circular. I >> chose Ring simply because that's what I was searching for when I wanted the >> data structure. The package will be named data-ring, so that should >> hopefully be enough to clue in the user that it's not dealing with the >> mathematical concept. >> > > The mathematical concept would likely also go in Data, unfortunately. See > for example Data.Monoid. If someone does at a Ring class sometime, it is > very likely to go into Data.Ring, which would lead to conflicts. In fact it > already exists, see the "monoids" package [1] > > I would prefer the name RingList or CircularList. As long as you put the > word "ring" in the package description users will still find it when > searching on hackage. > > > [1] > http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/monoids/0.1.25/doc/html/Data-Ring.html > > Twan >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
