Svein Ove Aas wrote: > > In this case, LGPL is a problem. It requires you to offer a way to > re-link such binaries against new versions/implementations of the > library, which in practice requires it to be either open source or > dynamically linked. >
Don't understand that. Can't we just put a constraint: "our binary works only with versions x.x.x-y.y.y of this LGPL licensed library"? The Cabal provides a way to put such constraint in build-depends... Andrey -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/short-licensing-question-tp27110059p27114282.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
