Ozgur Akgun <ozgurak...@gmail.com> writes: > Can someone give an example of a "reasonable" function that never uses one > of its parameters, and justify the existence of that parameter in this case, > please?
I would like to bring your attention to the "const" function: ,---- | const :: a -> b -> a | const a _ = a `---- For justification, I often use this function when I need to provide a function that takes two arguments by the function I want to use only needs one; as such either const of (flip const) can let me absorb and ignore the unneeded argument. Satisfied? ;-) -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
