I'll definitely take a closer look. On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 1:09 PM, John Meacham <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 06:57:48PM +0100, Henning Thielemann wrote: > > John Van Enk schrieb: > > > I need to be able to swap out the RTS. The place I want to stick > Haskell > > > absolutely needs its own custom RTS, and currently, I don't think it's > > > all that easy or clean to do that. > > > > > > Am I wrong? Are there resources describing how to do this already? > > > > As far as I know JHC is intended to work without an RTS. > > It is more that the RTS is generated as a part of the normal code > generation process, this is done by implementing as much as possible in > haskell itself, jhc has a very rich set of unboxed primitives, making it > as expressible as c-- for the most part, for the bits of C I do need, I > try to make them conditionally compilable, so parts that arn't used will > not be included. all in all, the overhead is ~= 1k or so. A side effect > is that jhc is very lightly coupled to any particular RTS, so > experimenting with alternate ones is pretty straigtforward. > > John > > -- > John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
