rl: > On 11/02/2010, at 05:03, Bryan O'Sullivan wrote: > > > I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. > > uvector is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and > > it's really seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, > > would you call the vector library good enough to use in production at the > > moment? > > Yes, with the caveat that I haven't really used it in production code > (I have tested and benchmarked it, though). BTW, I'll release version > 0.5 as soon as get a code.haskell.org account and move the repo there. >
That's the main problem. I think we could move to vector as a whole, if the suite of testing/ performance/documentation stuff from uvector was ported. Maybe this is a good job for the hackathon. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
