rl: > On 12/02/2010, at 12:39, Don Stewart wrote: > > > bos: > >> I'm thinking of switching the statistics library over to using vector. > >> uvector > >> is pretty bit-rotted in comparison to vector at this point, and it's really > >> seeing no development, while vector is The Shiny Future. Roman, would you > >> call > >> the vector library good enough to use in production at the moment? > > > > uvector's not seeing much development, but at least in the last round of > > benchmarks it was still consistently faster -- since it's been > > micro-optimized. > > FWIW, the development version of vector is usually faster the both > uvector and dph-prim-seq, at least for the development version of > NoSlow.
If Roman declares the vector to be faster -- my main concern here for flat uarrays -- and makes the repo available so we can work on it, I'd be willing to merge uvector's tests and docs and extra array operations in. -- Don _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
