Speaking about macrorewriting, I do prefer to break big modules (prototypes) into smaller ones, then step by step separate them into a set of minimally dependent and highly general cabal packages.
As for microrewriting I find it to be a good practice to explicate all possible (programmable or Real World) errors into dedicated ADT constructions. This draws enough attention to every error to guarantee that there is no missed risks and protection is good enough. Regards, Andrey -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/How-do-you-rewrite-your-code--tp27760033p27760681.html Sent from the Haskell - Haskell-Cafe mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
