On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 22:23 -0400, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote: > On Mar 23, 2010, at 13:39 , Ertugrul Soeylemez wrote: > > code look worse: layout-style syntactic sugar for function > > application. > > Here is an example of what it might look like: > > > > function $$ anArgument > > sin (x^2) > > anotherArgument > > f $ x + 3 > > Doesn't layout already do this? > > function arg1 > arg2 > arg3 >
As I understend
function $$ sin x
y
z
is
function (sin x) (y)
function sin x
y
z
is
function (sin) (x) (y) (z)
function $ sin x
y
z
is
function (sin (x) (y) (z))
Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
