Hi John, Any chance of seeing the benchmark? You're not the only one with an optimising compiler tucked away somewhere :-)
I have one "benchmark" where I outperform GHC by 21 times, although saying it's artificial is a bit of an understatement... Thanks, Neil On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, John Meacham <j...@repetae.net> wrote: > Here are jhc's timings for the same programs on my machine. gcc and ghc > both used -O3 and jhc had its full standard optimizations turned on. > > jhc: > ./hs.out 5.12s user 0.07s system 96% cpu 5.380 total > > gcc: > ./a.out 5.58s user 0.00s system 97% cpu 5.710 total > > ghc: > ./try 31.11s user 0.00s system 96% cpu 32.200 total > > > As you can see, jhc shines at this example, actually beating gcc -O3. It > isn't too surprising, this is exactly the sort of haskell code that jhc > excels at. > > John > > > -- > John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ - http://notanumber.net/ > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
