Jeremy Shaw <[email protected]> writes: > I keep running into issues where I want to use some version of parsec, > quickcheck, haxml, etc, in my code, but my code links against a different > third party library (e.g. network) which uses a different version of the > library (e.g., parsec) than what I want to use, and that makes cabal > unhappy.
Better (well, OK, maybe not _better_ per se but relevant) question: why isn't QuickCheck usage optional in so many of these libraries? There should be no reason for most people to build the testing functions, etc. in these libraries. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [email protected] IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
