On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:27 PM, Jacques Carette <care...@mcmaster.ca>wrote:
> Don Stewart wrote: > >> I think we don't see as much metaprogramming because of other language >> features -- laziness, operator syntax, and type classes -- make a bunch >> of common designs work without needing metaprogramming. >> >> > While true, there are also 2 other reasons for meta-programmers are not all > over Haskell: > 1. efficiency nuts are already using C++ templates and don't see why they > would switch, > 2. people who care about types use a typed meta-language (like metaocaml) > instead of an untyped template layer atop a (fantastic!) typed language. > Are you implying that template haskell is not typed? Jason
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
