Luke Palmer <lrpal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > So all in all there is no convincing argument for the restriction, > > but at least two convincing arguments against. > > When you say convincing, you are talking about yourself being > convinced, right? So this paragraph means "The arguments against my > position haven't convinced me, but the arguments for my position > have."
Yes, of course, although I think that I can speak for some others as well. Greets, Ertugrul -- nightmare = unsafePerformIO (getWrongWife >>= sex) http://blog.ertes.de/ _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
