On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 1:23 AM, Evan Laforge <qdun...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Luke Palmer <lrpal...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'd like to draw attention to a little script I wrote. I tend to use >> qualified imports and short names like "new" and "filter". This makes >> hasktags pretty much useless, since it basically just guesses which >> one to go to. hothasktags is a reimplementation of hasktags that uses >> haskell-src-exts to analyze the import structure to generate (scoped) >> tags pointing to the right definition. I'm pretty addicted to it, >> since it provides the only functionality I miss from visual studio >> :-). >> >> VIm only for now, since I don't know if emacs tags format supports >> scoped tags. I am aware that it is not perfect -- patches and bug >> reports welcome. > > Hi, thanks for this, I've been wanting something like this for a long > time! I have a suggestion and a question though: > > If you prepend the tags file with "!_TAG_FILE_SORTED\t1\t ~\n" then I > think vim should be able to do a binary search on the file.
Thanks! > This program generates a tag for each reference to a symbol: Almost. It generates a tag for each file/symbol pair such that the symbol is accessible from the file. > > Derive.PitchDeriver Derive/Derive.hs 98;" file:Cmd/Cmd.hs > Derive.PitchDeriver Derive/Derive.hs 98;" file:Cmd/Play.hs > Derive.PitchDeriver Derive/Derive.hs 98;" > file:Cmd/ResponderSync.hs > ... [ 20 more ] ... > > The vim tag documentation says these are "static" tags, and implies > they are meant to apply to symbols only valid within the same file, > but this is clearly not the case. Actually, the vim doc implies that > only "file:" is defined, and doesn't talk about "scoped tags" so I'm > not sure what is going on. Anyway, whenever I go to a tag I have to > first step through a message that says "1 of 25" or so. There's one > for each reference in the tags file, even though those are references > in other files. Hmm odd, I don't get that behavior. Is that with the sorted annotation? What version of vim? > What's going on? I even checked the current docs at vim.org and they > don't mention a file:xyz form either. I think I saw it documented *somewhere*, but now that I look again I can't find it anywhere. Maybe it was in a dream. I hope a newer version of vim didn't remove the support or something... Luke _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
