Stephen Tetley wrote: > I suspect the difference between the ML module system vs. typeclasses > will be as important as lazy vs. strict. As a style point, Ocaml > programmers don't seem too prone to combinator mania - so I think > golf is a bit less popular over there.
Both the lack of laziness and the value restriction can sometimes force combinator definitions to be eta-expanded, which I think makes this style of programming much less attractive. Cheers, Ganesh =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html =============================================================================== _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
