I don't know whether I could have gotten away with it but was happy to go through all the intermediate stages: it seemed the safer bet.
The building of a complete GHC bundle from source is such a major undertaking that I really didn't want to build it with an old compiler and lose all of the testing that goes into each GHC release. Chris -----Original Message----- From: Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 18 April 2010 12:03 AM To: Chris Dornan Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Haskell-cafe] building Haskell Platform for CentOS 5.2 with a /tmp mounted noexec "Chris Dornan" <[email protected]> writes: > . Keep trying generic binary Linux ghc packages until one that works > is found (in this case ghc-6.8.3); > > . With ghc-6.8.3 installed, download the src tar ball for the next > ghc release (6.10.1) and build and install that; > I wonder, could you have gone straight from 6.8.3 to 6.12.1 (or if not that, since 6.10.1 built then presumably 6.10.4 probably would have as well). -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic [email protected] IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
