On Thu, 06 May 2010 12:00:01 +0100 Neil Brown <nc...@kent.ac.uk> wrote:
> At which point I prefer Ivan's liftM version rather than the above > section (or worse: using (<$>) prefix). The original request is a > relatively common thing to want to do, so I was slightly surprised > that hoogling for: > > (b -> c) -> (a -> f b) -> a -> f c > > didn't turn up any relevant results. This function is a lot like > (<=<) but with a pure rather than side-effecting function on the > left-hand side. > ha ! I had actually remembered to hoogle :-) and didn't get anything either, only I wasn't sure I put the signature in correctly. Brian _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
