I have a general question about this kind of approach. Tutorials on continuations in Haskell always come with a warning about not using it unless you have to because it makes code unreadable and unmaintainable. Is this true in your opinion? -deech
On 6/10/10, Job Vranish <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah I don't see why not. The ContT monad should work great. > Also, depending on what you're doing, the ErrorT monad might do what you > want as well. > > - Job > > 2010/6/10 Günther Schmidt <[email protected]> > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I'm about to write a rather lengthy piece of IO code. Depending on the >> results of some of the IO actions I'd like the computation to stop right >> there and then. >> >> Now I know in general how to write this but I'm wondering if this is one >> of >> those occasions where I should make use of the Cont monad to make an early >> exit. >> >> Günther >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Haskell-Cafe mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe >> > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
