On Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:30:47 +0200, you wrote: >Then I thought, what if I replace the (*) and (+) operations which are applied >when I multipy the matrix with a vector (i.e. a vector if inputs or outputs) >by something more general. So I replaced (+) by function application and my >matrix was now a matrix of functions. But then I got lost trying to find a >way to invert such a matrix.
You'd have to have a general way of finding the inverse of a function, which doesn't exist (many functions aren't invertible at all, for example). -Steve _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
