cas...@istar.ca writes: > The functional-object style seems to be gaining momentum. > Is there any way to convert monads into objects, so that beginners > have an easier time with the syntax and thus we can attract more > people to the language?
I seriously have no idea what you're talking about here. What is the "functional-object style" and why would we want to convert monads into objects? Anyway, have a look at: * http://www.timber-lang.org/ * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/O%27Haskell (homepage link seems down) * http://homepages.cwi.nl/~ralf/OOHaskell/ * http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/The_Monad.Reader/Issue3/Functional_Programming_vs_Object_Oriented_Programming etc. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
