On 25/06/2010, at 06:41, Alexey Khudyakov wrote:
> Then constructor like one below arise naturally. And I don't know how to write
> them properly. It's possible to use fromList but then list could be allocated
> which is obviously wasteful.
>
>> vector2 :: Double -> Double -> Vec2D
>> vector2 x y = ...
>> -- Vec2D is some wrapper around Vector data type
Your best bet is probably singleton x ++ singleton y. Unfortunately, GHC
doesn't seem to provide any real way of specifying array literals.
> Another question is there any specific problems with short vectors? They could
> be just 2 elements long. I mean performance problems
A data type like this one should be faster:
data Vec2D = Vec2D {-# UNPACK #-} !Double {-# UNPACK #-} !Double
Firstly, this needs one less indirection for accessing the components.
Secondly, GHC's simplifier knows a lot more about algebraic data types than it
does about arrays so the above definition will often lead to better
optimisations. Whether or not the difference is significant probably depends on
the program.
Roman
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
