Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fisc...@web.de> writes: > That's more common, yes (I don't remember ever having used delete(By) > intentionally). But we've filter for that, so it wouldn't make sense to > give delete(By) the same semantics. Hence, if you provide both names, what > else could deleteBy do?
That's like asking why we have mapM and forM, etc. -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
