Daniel Fischer <daniel.is.fisc...@web.de> writes: > On Friday 02 July 2010 22:32:37, Nils Schweinsberg wrote: >> On 02.07.2010 20:05, Jason Dagit wrote: >> > In other words, don't be shy! >> >> Ok, thanks for the reply! :) However, a question about haddock: >> >> evalMState :: Forkable m >> => MState t m a -- ^ Action to evaluate >> -> t -- ^ Initial state value >> -> m a >> >> This (and run-/execMState) gets rendered incorrectly. "Action to >> evaluate" is completly lost and "Initial state value" has moved one >> upwards to the "MState t m a". Is that a haddock bug or my fault? > > Probably Haddock's fault. It had that bug for a while.
It's been fixed in the 2.7 release apparently (I haven't upgraded, so I haven't checked that myself). -- Ivan Lazar Miljenovic ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com IvanMiljenovic.wordpress.com _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe