On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic <ivan.miljeno...@gmail.com> wrote: > Felipe Lessa <felipe.le...@gmail.com> writes: >> I'm sorry for being silly, but what's the motivation of having this >> canonic form? =) > > A few things come to mind: > > * Easier to reason about, [...] > * Less ambiguity: [...]
So you want to do some post-processing to the Dot graph inside Haskell-land? Or is it just a pretty printer? I mean, Dot will accept both and produce the same result (by definition), so if you just wanted to draw it then there wouldn't be any difference. Cheers! :) -- Felipe. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
