I understand that part, but the strings are generated from SDocs, and So unless internally SDoc doesn't use String then I'm afraid there's nothing I can do about that :/
Or rather, Is there a way to efficiently make CWStrings from SDocs? Regards, Phyx On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Thomas DuBuisson < [email protected]> wrote: > That code is effectively copying the data (thats what those peeks / > pokes do), so it stands to reason it would be slow by most performance > standards. The reason ByteStrings are fast when used both by C and > Haskell is there is a zero-copy `useAsCString`. > > Cheers, > Thomas > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Phyx <[email protected]> wrote: > > Marshalling large amount of data from and to C > > > > http://phyx.pastebin.com/WXGBr1bX shows the code I use to do this (it's > > autogenerated, so just looking at 1 block should be enough) > > > > The tool is mine, so i can change the code it generates, but i would need > to > > know how to do it better first. > > > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 13:29, Phyx <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hello > >> > > >> > I'm wondering if anyone ever benchmarked marshalling in Haskell/GHC. > No > >> > matter how much I optimize my Haskell code my program still seems to > run > >> > slow, which leads me to beleive that Marshalling is painfully slow. > >> > > >> > Does anyone know a way I can test this and fix it? > >> > >> What kind of marshalling are you referring to? > >> > >> /M > >> > >> -- > >> Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) > >> magnus@therning.org Jabber: magnus@therning.org > >> http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
