On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 15:20:55 -0700
John Meacham <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > type family Add n m :: *
> > >
> > > type instance Add Zero  Zero           = Zero
> > > type instance Add Zero (SuccessorTo n) = SuccessorTo n
> > > type instance Add (SuccessorTo n) m    = SuccessorTo (Add n m)
> > 
> > Standard package is could be somewhat difficult. Standards are
> > undeniably good but "one size doesn't fit all" rule does apply here.
> > Your package couldn't be used to represent big numbers. Little real
> > work has been done on this so it's reasonable to expect progress or
> > even some breakthough. 
> 
> I thought there was some elegant way to express type level numbers
> using balanced ternary, but I can't find a reference to it at the
> moment.
> 
Balanced ternary is useful for represeting signed integers.
Implementation of next, prev and basic arithmetic operations is not
very elegant

Some time ago I wrote implementation of type level numbers using binary
and balanced ternary encoding. Will upload to hackage soon. 
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe

Reply via email to