On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Antoine Latter <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Ivan Miljenovic > <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >> That said, if parsec2 is only a bug-fix branch of parsec-2.x, is there >> any particular reason work couldn't be done to improve the performance >> of parsec-3 when using the compatibility layer (and even improving the >> performance of parsec-3 overall) rather than a specific branch/fork? > > The release of parsec-3.1 dramatically improved the performance of > parsec3 to roughly parsec-2.1 levels. So I don't know of any downside > to switching over to the compatibility layer other the fact that it's > a much newer code-base, and that it's a much further departure How about I finish my sentences. My second downside was that parsec-3 is a much further departure from Haskell2010 than parsec-2. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
