You're right. It's bad to have toRational in Real. It's also bad to have Show and Eq as superclasses to Num.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Omari Norman <om...@smileystation.com> wrote: > Why is toRational a method of Real? I thought that real numbers need not > be rational, such as the square root of two. Wouldn't it make more sense > to have some sort of Rational typeclass with this method? Thanks. > --Omari > > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
