On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 4:00 AM, Michael Snoyman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Tim Matthews <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Michael Snoyman <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Quick update: I'm including the "Stylish" code in the hamlet package now, >>> and renaming it to "Camlet" (CSS-hamlet). I'm also including something >>> called "Jamlet", which doesn't do much besides variable interpolation. As >>> you might guess, it's for Javascript. I mention it at the end of my most >>> recent blog post[1]. >>> Michael >> >> While It's just a name and not really important: hamlet was haml so I >> first imagined sasset, sasslet or another name from one of the works of >> Shakespeare but I then really liked stylish as I thought it would tell that >> something with solid foundations and theory could still appear, hip and >> pretty. >> >> What is important though is the code. This is absolutely great and success >> just keeps getting harder to avoid. >> > This is by no means a final decision; I'm open to being convinced that other > names are better. But I'll point out the main reason for the Camlet/Jamlet > name choice: easy to remember and type. I found "stylish" to be much harder > to get out than "camlet"; that might just be because I'm so used to hamlet > already, but that's exactly my goal here: make these three templating > systems work together nicely to make the developers life a little bit > easier. > Michael > _______________________________________________ > Haskell-Cafe mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe > >
CaSSius and JSaesar? Alex _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
