But do you think there would be more Haskell jobs offered (in absolute terms), if no investment firms offered jobs? Is there some kind of quota of job offers that gets used up?
There seems to be more job applicants that job offers at the moment, so I'm not sure what the problem is. On Mon, Aug 9, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Tom Hawkins <tomahawk...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's disproportionate. 95% of the job offerings in functional > programming are with investment firms. I believe investment banking > is important, but does it really need to dominate a large percentage > of the world's top tier programmers? Is computing the risk of > derivative contracts more important than pursuing sustainable energy, > new drug discovery, improving crop yields, etc. Some will argue > investment banking enables all of these things -- and I'm sure many > people in the industry go to work everyday feeling proud of their > contributions. But I just think most of this talent is going in to > improve the bottom line and little else. _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
