My worry with bumping only the patch level is that
people who explicitly want to depend on the efficient version of my
library need to depend on a.b.c.D and cannot follow the good practice
of depending on a.b.*.
Well, then you have ">= a.b.c.d && < a.(b+1)".
Ok, it seems this is less of an issue than I initially thought. I have
changed my mind and will probably make a patch-level release without
an identical major release. (I'll make an additional major release
with a generalised API however.)
Thanks!
Sebastian
--
Underestimating the novelty of the future is a time-honored tradition.
(D.G.)
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
