Hi, I thought I'd go through my uploaded Hackage packages and decide which ones I am going to maintain, which are worth others maintaining, and which are probably not worth maintaining (spoiler, most aren't).
1. Interested in and will continue maintaining: gd, higherorder, cgi-utils, fastcgi, ircbouncer For gd, cgi-utils, fastcgi, ircbouncer I'd like to write test cases and do some profiling and general proper quality assurance. For the rest... 2. Not really interested in maintaining, but in a good state and probably worth maintaining: pappy (Bryan Ford gave me permission to upload and for someone to maintain this) 3. Not interested in maintaining, but in a good state, not worth maintaining: kibro, blogination, simplesmtpclient (this has been usurped by http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hsmtpclient (same author)) 4. Not interested in maintaining, in a bad state (i.e. build failure): validate, lojban, goa, wordcloud The build failure ones and ones not worth maintaining are probably best being taken out back. What do we do with packages we're not interested in maintaining anymore? Gracenotes recommended something like changing the category to Unmaintained (and on Hackage 2.0, a tag). Good idea for now? Chars! _______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
