On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 20:36 +0200, Alberto G. Corona wrote: > Why not to define it for any monad, for example STM (TVars) and > whatever?
I'm really sorry but I fail to see what does 'it' refers to. reference 0.1 contains at this moment definitions for: - Reference TVar STM - Reference IORef IO - Reference MVar IO - Reference (STRef s) (ST s) (http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/archive/reference/0.1/doc/html/Data-Reference.html#t:Reference) So in fact there is already support for STM/TVar pair. Regards
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Haskell-Cafe mailing list Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
