Hello.
http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/exps.html#sect3.14 a obscure (to me) note
which says
"As indicated by the translation of do, variables bound by let have fully
polymorphic types while those defined by <- are lambda bound and are thus
monomorphic."
What actually does it mean?
And, also, would it make any difference if
do {p <- e; stmts} = let ok p = do {stmts}
ok _ = fail "..."
in e >>= ok
is redefined as "e >>= (\p -> do {stmts})"?
Thanks, Alexander
_______________________________________________
Haskell-Cafe mailing list
Haskell-Cafe@haskell.org
http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-cafe
